"CIVIL CASES"
LIMITATION ACT.
APPLICATION 12(2) CPC,
3 years after, after knowledge.
EXECUTION OF FAMILY COURT DECREE
No limitation
2001 SCMR 1128
CPC.
RES JUDICAT
APPLICABLE ON ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS.
2017 CLC 466

Order VII
ORDER VII, ROLE 1 DIRECTORY IN NATURE AND NOT MANDATORY, CASE CANNOT BE DISMISSED.
2016 CLC 1316
1991 MLD 2295
PLD 2006 SC 66
2010 MLD 1596
2012 YLR 1515
2006 SCMR 489

ORDER 7 RULE 3 CPC.
A PLAINT SHOULD CONTAIN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE IMMOVABLE PROPERTY TO SUFFICIENTLY IDENTIFY THE SAME AND TO FACILITATE THE EXECUTING COURT.
2013 CLC Pesh 1171

REVISION U/S 115 CPC
CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF FACTS
NEITHERPERVERSE NOR ERRONEOUS……..REVISION DISMISSED
2013 YLR Pesh 1697+1703+2000 SCMR 346+PLD 1994 SC 291+PLD 2002 SC 293.
CONCURRENT FINDING OF FACTS BELOW & HC CAN’T CHANGE THESE FINDINGS BY NEW INTERPRETATION OF EVIDENCE.
1984 SCMR 504+1997 SCMR 1139+2013 MLD Pesh1240+2013 CLC Sindh 1164+2012 SCMR 1373+2009 SCMR 54+ 2005 SCMR 733
WHEN THERE IS GROSS AND PATENT VIOLATION OF THE LAW, CAUSING MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE, THE HC IS UNDER LEGAL OBLIGATION TO RECTIFY THE ERROR BY INTERFERING IN LEGAL FINDING 2004 SCMR 1001+2006 SCMR 1238

PLEADINGS
PARTIES BOUND IN THEIR PLEADINGS, NEW FACTS CANT BE BROUGHT IN APPEAL, PARTIES CAN’T BE ALLOWED TO DEVIATE FROM THEIR PLEADINGS.
PLD 1974 SC 322+1986 SCMR 1696 + PLD 2007  SC 460+582+1996 SCMR 336+2013 CLC Sindh 1164
EVIDENCE, LED ON THE PLEA NOT RAISED IN THE PLAINT…VALIDITY…WOULD NOT BE WORTH RELIANCE AND WOULD BE REJECTED
2013 CLC BALUCHISTAN 1261
PLEADING IS NOT THE EVIDENCE.
2013 CLC BALUCHISTAN 1261
EVIDENCE, LED ON THE PLEA NOT RAISED IN THE PLAINT…VALIDITY…WOULD NOT BE WORTH RELIANCE, WOULD BE REJECTED.
2013 CLC Baluchistan 1261

ORDER 37 CPC
ORAL EVIDENCE, NOT APPRECIATED
1989 ML 380
TWO WITNESSES MANDATORY
2000 YLR 2927+PL 1995 Lah 395
NO INTERLOCUTORY RELIEF CAN BE SOUGHT, TILL LEAVE GRANTED,
1997 ML 1835
REGARDING SURETY
SURETY NOT MANDATORY
198 CLC 353
REQUIREMENT OF THE COPY WITH THE SUMMONS, MANDATORY.
1990 ML 1258+2001 ML 1759
1990 ML 203
1993 CLC 2217
2003 YLR 2583
SUMMERY TRAIL
PLD 2016 Lah 610

EXECUTION OF DECREE
EXECUTING COURT CANT QUESTION THE EXECUTABILITY OF DECREE.
CONTRA, IE IN CASE THE DECREE IS FOUND A NULLITY IN THE EYE OF LAW OR HAS BEEN PASSED BY THE COURT HAVING NO JURISDICTION OE IS PASSED IN VIOLATION OF LAW.
PLD 1951 Lah 32
PLD 1961 SC 192
PLD 1965 SC 505
PLD 2001 SC 131
PLD 2009 SC 760
PLD 2013 SC 131
2014 SCMR 322

ORDER 26 RULE 9
Local commission
REPORT OF LC, NOT BINDING ON COURT, CREAT NO RIGHT ON PARTY
PLD 2017 PESH 14

OBJECTIONS
IF ON THE AUTHENTICITY OF A DOCUMENT NO OBJECTION RAISED IN TRIAL COURT, THE SAME CAN’T BE RAISED AT BELATED STAGE.
PLD 2001 SC 158ein.
POWER OF ATTORNEY
NO COUNSEL CAN WORK TILL THE EXECUTION OF POA OF HIS CLIENT.
PLD 2017 Lah 219
NADRA CASES
CORRECTION IN BIRTH CERTIFICATE
2011 CLC 265
2008 SCMR 713
2005 SCMR 152
2009 YLR 1296
PLAINT
EVERY FACT STATED IN PLAINT SHOULD NOT TAKEN AS TRUE AND CORRECT WHILE CONSIDERING PLAINT

2015 CLC Sindh 1

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CASE LAW, BAIL MATTERS NO BAIL/PETITION CAN BE FILED, IN CASE THE SAME WAS EARLIER WITHDRAWN ETC, UNTIL FRESH GROUNDS AVAILABLE. 2013 SCMR 1509  PLD 2013 Lah 540 PLD 1986 SC 173 22 a Cr.PC Even for the purpose of the bail, law should not be stretched in favour of the prosecution. PLD 1972 SC 277 Matter pertaining to nikahnama/family case, not to be resolve in criminal case. 2013 YLR Lah 201 PLD 1984 SC 95 Rejection of pre arrest bail, no ground for refusal of after arrest bail PLD 1982 SC 227 2013 P.Cr.LJ Lah 487   Bail u/s 498 Cr.PC ABSCONSION MISUSE OF LAW & COURT’S CONCESSION, BAIL REFUSED PLD 1981 SC 93 2013 YLR Lah 1914 SCOPE OF PRE ARREST, LIMITED, BAIL REFUSED. 1996 SCMR 71 RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED ONLY WHERE MALAFIDE AND ULTERIOR MOTIVE SHOWN AND NO OFFENCE TO HAVE BEEN COMMITTED. 1996 SCMR 74+PLD 2009 SC 427 MERIT OF THE CASE CAN ALSO BE SEEN AT PRE ARREST BAIL. 2013 SD 488 2013 YLR Lah 1698 PLJ 1989 sc 526 Mi
Read more
"FAMILY CASES" ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ IN PROCEEDINGS IN FAMILY COURT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY, FAIR PLAY AND JUSTICE. 2017 SCMR 321 PROPERTY MENTIONED IN NIKAH NAMA PROPERTY MENTIONED IN NIKAH NAMA, TO BE GIVEN TO WIFE. 2016 MLD 925 2010 YLR 2452 2013 YLR 1118 2015 PLD 88 ANY CONDITION, MENTIONED IN NIKAH NAMA BY THE HUSBAND, IN CASE OF PRONOUNCING TALAQ ETC BY HUSBAND, NO LEGAL VALUE. 2008 SCMR 186 DOWER DOWER, BETWEEN SPOUSES CAN BE INCREASED SUBSEQUENTLY. 2017 PLJ 41 2016 SCMR 2170 2016 MLD 1411 SNATCHING OF DOWER AFTER GIVING THE WIFE, MATTER FALLS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF FAMILY COURT. PLD 2015 Lah 57 NO APPEAL LIES AGAINST DECREE OF DOWER AMOUNT. 2001 SCJ 297 CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION TO CHALLENGE THE ORDER ON THE GROUND THAT THE EVIDENCE WAS NOT PROPERLY APPRECIATED, AS FINDING OF FACT RECORDED BY THE COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION COULD NOT BE DISTURBED SOLELY ON
Read more