TRIAL NARCOTICS CASES

9C CNSA. SENTENCE IS TO BE PROPORTIONATE TO THE HEROIN POWDER IN THE FORM IN WHICH IT IS MARKETABLE, REGARDLESS OF ITS COMPOSITION
2006 SCMR 1539
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 CASE OF RECOVERY OF CHARS BY A LADYCARRIER, BENIGN ATTITUDE OF THE SUPREME COURT…. SENTENCE REDUCED
2006 SCMR 1041
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

 EVERY PACKET OF
CONTRABAND SHOULD BE
PROVED AS CONTRABAND
2006 SCMR 1051
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

 SS. 20 & 21 OF CNSA. WOULD SHOW THAT ONLY IN EXCEPTIONAL CASES, IN WHICH SEARCH WARRANT CANNOT POSSIBLY BE OBTAINED BEFORE CONDUCTING THE RAID, AN OFFICER AUTHORIZED IN THIS BEHALF CAN PROCEED FOR CONDUCT OF RAID WITHOUT WARRANT BUT THIS POWER CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO BE USED IN THE NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES
2003 SCMR 881
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 SS.32 & 74 OF CNSA. NO ABSOLUTE BAR IN RELEASE OF VEHICLE ON SAPURDARI IF IT IS PRIMA FECIE ESTABLISHED THAT THE ORIGINAL OWNER HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE CRIME COMMITTED THEREIN.
2003 SCMR 246
PRINCIPLE WHERE 
QUANTUM OF CONTRA
BAND NOT HUGE
NLR 2006 Cr 331
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 FIR CAN BE QUASHED, DESPITE COMMENCEMENT OF TRAIL.
2009 SCMR 141
2009 YLR Kar 1724+lah 1837
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SAMPLE SHOULD BE TAKEN FROM ALL LITTER
2008 SCMR 991
2003 MLD 259
No private witness
PLD 2001 Kar 369
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENTENCE IN POWDER CASE, SHOULD BE IN THE FORM IN WHICH IT IS MARKETABLE, REGARDLESS OF ITS COMPOSITION
2006 SCMR 1539
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DRIVER’S CASE
1997 SCMR 540
PLD 2003 Kar 230
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 IN THE ABSENCE OF IO AS PW, SECONDARY STATEMENT, NOT BELIEVABLE.
2006 YLR 2061
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 APPEAL IN 9C, 1ST OFFENDER
2007 MLD Lah 46+81
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 REPORT OF F.SC LAB
HAVING NO DETAIL OF PROTOCOL OF TEST APPLIED, REPORT NOT RELIED UPON.
2016 P.CR.LJ LAH 1170
2015 SCMR 1002
2007 PCr.LJ Lah 1984
RULES RELATING TO THE TESTING PROCESS IN LABS ARE DIRECTORY AND NOT MANDATORY.
2016 YLR Lah 1060
RULES MANDATORY, IN DEROGATION SAME CAN’T BE RELIED UPON FOR CONVICTING THE ACCUSED
2016 SCMR 621
LAB REPORT NOT ON RECORD, NO VALUE
2007 PCr.LJ 913
WHERE REPORT OF THE CHEMICAL EXAMINER IS SOUGHT IN A PROPER MANNER, EXAMINER WAS SUMMONED AS WITNESS.
2005 YLR 742
2006 YLR 286
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMPLAINANT AND THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER SAME, HELD, IN VIOLATION OF PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE.
2016 PCRLJ Sindh 106 (Note)   137
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

UNSCALED SITE PLANE
2016 MLD Lah 1441
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ACCUSED CAN ONLY BE PUNISHED TO THE EXTENT OF PROVED NARCOTICS.
2016 YLR Lah 92
2006 YLR 2376
PLD 2004 SC 856
2005 PCr.LJ 1173+1506
PLD 2003 Kar 230
2006 SCMR 1051
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MONOGRAM OF THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER.
15 SCMR 291
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 SAMPLE SHOULD BE SENT FROM EVERY PIECE OF CONTRABAND, SEPARATELY.
15 SCMR 279+308
 PLD 2012 SC 380
2016 MLD Lah 1755
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSOLIDATED SAMPLE
NOT APPRECIATED.
2016 SCMR 909+707+806
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BURDON OF PROOF, IN CNSA
ON PROSECUTION
2016 YLR Lah 2755+Sindh 1081
2016 MLD Lah 2057
2016 PCRLJ Lah 407
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BENEFIT OF DOUBT, IN CNSA.
2016 MLD Lah 2057
2016 PCr.LJ Lah 1688
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

342 CR.PC, IN CNSA
2016 YLR Lah 2755
2016 P.Cr.LJ Pesh 1178+ Lah 1234+1161+1036
2016 YLR Lah Notes 123 page 89
2016 YLR Lah 774
2016 PCr.LJ Lah 844+407
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PLACE OF RECOVERY NOT IN EXCLUSIVE POSSESSION OF THE ACCUSED.
2016 YLR Lah 774
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

129 g (Q Sh. Ord) IN CNSA
2016 YLR Lah 1093
2016 P.Cr.LJ Lah 1668
2016 YLR Sindh 85
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 FACT AS TO HOW THE RAIDING PARTY CAME TO KNOW ABOUT ACCUSED, COULD NOT BE ESTABLISHED.
2016 YLR Lah 2455
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UNLESS THE PROSECUTION WAS ABLE TO SHOW THAT THE SAMPLE WHICH WAS ANALYZED BY THE CHEMICAL EXAMINER WAS VERY SAME SAMPLE WHICH WAS DRAWN FROM THE CONTRABAND HEROIN, CAN’T BE RELIED UPON.
2016 YLR Lah 2455
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

REPORT OF F.SC LAB WITH NO DETAIL OF TEST
2015 SCMR 1002
2007 P.Cr.LJ 1984
2ND REPORT OF LAB, NO VALUE, AS THE SAME DOES NOT CONFIRM THE WITNESSES OF SEIZURE OF SAMPLE.
2016 MLD Lah 1002
2002 PCr.LJ 32
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SAPURDARI MATTER IN CNSA
ALLOWED, IN APPEAL
2016 YLR Lah 1105
IN SAPURDARI OF VEHICLE DUTY OF THE TRIAL COURT TO GET ESTABLISHED WHETHER THE OWNER OF THE VEHICLE WAS AWARE OF THE FACT OF THE CRIME.
2016 YLR Lah 1105+2010 SCMR 1181+2003 SCMR 246
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONTRADICTION IN PROSECUTION EVIDENCE.
PROSECUTION WITNESSES, AT VARIANCE, BOD WAS GIVEN TO THE ACCUSED.
2016 YLR Sindh 1829
2016 YLR Lah 1205+1039
VARIANCE QUA THE COLOR OF THE ALLEGED RECOVERED NARCOTICS.
2016 YLR Lah Notes 123 page 89
VARIANCE QUA THE CASE PROPERTY STATED BY PWS AND PRODUCED IN COURT.
2016 YLR Lah notes 123 page 89
VARIANCE QUA THE PLACE WHERE SAMPLE HAD BEEN DRAWN AND AS TO WHO DRAWN THE SAMPLE.
2016 MLD Lah 2057
VARIANCE QUA THE SCALE USED
2016 MLD Lah 2057
Variance qua the deposit of sample and case property in malkahana.
2016 MLD Lah 1825
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DELAY
IN SENDING THE SAMPLES, HELD, DOUBTFUL.
2016 YLR Lah 1205
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


REVISION
REVISION AGAINST JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION.
NOT PROVIDED
2016 PCr.LJ Lah 1054
PLD 2013 SC 361
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


DUTY OF THE TRIAL COURT TO GET ESTABLISHED WHETHER THE OWNER OF THE VEHICLE WAS AWARE OF THE FACT OF THE CRIME.
2016 PCr.LJ Lah 56


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CASE LAW, BAIL MATTERS NO BAIL/PETITION CAN BE FILED, IN CASE THE SAME WAS EARLIER WITHDRAWN ETC, UNTIL FRESH GROUNDS AVAILABLE. 2013 SCMR 1509  PLD 2013 Lah 540 PLD 1986 SC 173 22 a Cr.PC Even for the purpose of the bail, law should not be stretched in favour of the prosecution. PLD 1972 SC 277 Matter pertaining to nikahnama/family case, not to be resolve in criminal case. 2013 YLR Lah 201 PLD 1984 SC 95 Rejection of pre arrest bail, no ground for refusal of after arrest bail PLD 1982 SC 227 2013 P.Cr.LJ Lah 487   Bail u/s 498 Cr.PC ABSCONSION MISUSE OF LAW & COURT’S CONCESSION, BAIL REFUSED PLD 1981 SC 93 2013 YLR Lah 1914 SCOPE OF PRE ARREST, LIMITED, BAIL REFUSED. 1996 SCMR 71 RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED ONLY WHERE MALAFIDE AND ULTERIOR MOTIVE SHOWN AND NO OFFENCE TO HAVE BEEN COMMITTED. 1996 SCMR 74+PLD 2009 SC 427 MERIT OF THE CASE CAN ALSO BE SEEN AT PRE ARREST BAIL. 2013 SD 488 2013 YLR Lah 1698 PLJ 1989 sc 526 Mi
Read more
"FAMILY CASES" ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ IN PROCEEDINGS IN FAMILY COURT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY GENERAL PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY, FAIR PLAY AND JUSTICE. 2017 SCMR 321 PROPERTY MENTIONED IN NIKAH NAMA PROPERTY MENTIONED IN NIKAH NAMA, TO BE GIVEN TO WIFE. 2016 MLD 925 2010 YLR 2452 2013 YLR 1118 2015 PLD 88 ANY CONDITION, MENTIONED IN NIKAH NAMA BY THE HUSBAND, IN CASE OF PRONOUNCING TALAQ ETC BY HUSBAND, NO LEGAL VALUE. 2008 SCMR 186 DOWER DOWER, BETWEEN SPOUSES CAN BE INCREASED SUBSEQUENTLY. 2017 PLJ 41 2016 SCMR 2170 2016 MLD 1411 SNATCHING OF DOWER AFTER GIVING THE WIFE, MATTER FALLS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF FAMILY COURT. PLD 2015 Lah 57 NO APPEAL LIES AGAINST DECREE OF DOWER AMOUNT. 2001 SCJ 297 CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION TO CHALLENGE THE ORDER ON THE GROUND THAT THE EVIDENCE WAS NOT PROPERLY APPRECIATED, AS FINDING OF FACT RECORDED BY THE COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION COULD NOT BE DISTURBED SOLELY ON
Read more
"CIVIL CASES" LIMITATION ACT. APPLICATION 12(2) CPC, 3 years after, after knowledge. EXECUTION OF FAMILY COURT DECREE No limitation 2001 SCMR 1128 CPC. RES JUDICAT APPLICABLE ON ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS. 2017 CLC 466 Order VII ORDER VII, ROLE 1 DIRECTORY IN NATURE AND NOT MANDATORY, CASE CANNOT BE DISMISSED. 2016 CLC 1316 1991 MLD 2295 PLD 2006 SC 66 2010 MLD 1596 2012 YLR 1515 2006 SCMR 489 ORDER 7 RULE 3 CPC . A PLAINT SHOULD CONTAIN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE IMMOVABLE PROPERTY TO SUFFICIENTLY IDENTIFY THE SAME AND TO FACILITATE THE EXECUTING COURT. 2013 CLC Pesh 1171 REVISION U/S 115 CPC CONCURRENT FINDINGS OF FACTS NEITHERPERVERSE NOR ERRONEOUS……..REVISION DISMISSED 2013 YLR Pesh 1697+1703+2000 SCMR 346+PLD 1994 SC 291+PLD 2002 SC 293. CONCURRENT FINDING OF FACTS BELOW & HC CAN’T CHANGE THESE FINDINGS BY NEW INTERPRETATION OF EVIDENCE. 1984 SCMR 504+1997 SCMR 1139+2013 MLD Pesh1240+2013 CLC Sindh 1164+2012 SCMR
Read more